Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) was established on 27th October, 2014. Since quality enhancement is a continuous process, the IQAC should be a part of the institution’s system and work towards realizing the goals of quality enhancement and susance.
The IQAC has to make a significant and meaningful contribution in the post-accreditation phase through channelizing the efforts and measures of an institution towards academic excellence.
To develop a quality system for conscious, consistent and catalytic programmed action to improve the academic and administrative performance of the Institute
To promote measures for institutional functioning towards quality enhancement through internalization of quality culture and institutionalization of best practices.
Development and application of quality benchmarks/parameters for the various academic and administrative activities of the Institute.
Facilitating the creation of a learner-centric environment conducive for quality education and faculty maturation to adopt the required knowledge and technology for participatory teaching and learning process.
Arrangement for feedback responses from students, parents and other stakeholders on quality-related institutional processes.
Dissemination of information on the various quality parameters of higher education.
Organization of inter and intra institutional workshops, seminars on quality related themes and promotion of quality circles.
Documentation of the various programmes/activities of the Institute, leading to quality improvement.
Acting as a nodal agency of the Institute for coordinating quality-related activities, including adoption and dissemination of good practices.
Development of Quality Culture in Institute.
Preparation of the Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) of the Institute based on the quality parameters/assessment criteria developed by the relevant quality assurance body (like NAAC) in the prescribed format.
|Sr. No||IQAC Composition||Name|
|1||Chairperson : Head of the Institute||
Dr. Anil V. Kale (Principal)
|2||Teachers to represent all level (Three to Eight )||Prof. Pragati Patil (Vice-Principal)
Prof. Suresh Salankar(Director, Academics)
Prof. Anup Gade (Dean, Academics)
Dr. Balram Timande ( Dean, R & D)
Prof. V.P.Kshirsagar (Dean, T & P)
Dr.V.P.Talodhikar (HoD)Mechanical Engineering Department
Dr. Prashant Thakre (HoD, Electrical Engineering)
Dr. Bhavana Deshpande (HoD, Science and Humanities)
|3||One member from the Management||Prof. Sandeep Gaikwad ( Treasurer,GPGI)|
|4||Few senior administrative officers||Mrs. Surekha Raut (Director, Finance)
Prof. Amey Khedikar (Registrar)
Prof. Radharaman Saha (COE)
Prof. Kalpit Kourase (Dean, CSR)
|5||One nominee each from local society, Students and Alumni|| Mrs. Anasuya Kale Chhabraji, Swaccha Association, Nagpur (NGO)
Mr. Mayur Dongre (Manager in BYJU’S (Alumni))
Ms. Shubham Nikhade ( Student)
|6||One nominee each from Employers/Industrialists / stakeholders||Mr.Vikas Mishra, Suntronics Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur
Mr. Amol Pusadkar, Director, Prodeskon Consulting Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur
Mr.Jeewanlal Shankar Pardhi (Parent)
|7||One of the senior teachers as the co-ordinator / Director of the IQAC||Dr. Pravin Tajane (IQAC coordinator)|
Timely, efficient and progressive performance of academic, administrative and financial tasks.
The relevance and quality of academic and research programmes.
Equitable access to and affordability of academic programmes for students.
Optimization and integration of modern methods of teaching and learning.
The credibility of evaluation procedures.
The adequacy, maintenance and proper allocation of support structure and services.
Research sharing and networking with other institutions in India and abroad.
To conduct the meeting at the beginning of each semester (Twice in a year).
Prime agenda of the meeting would be review based planning of academic policies for the sustainable growth of the Institute.
To develop a monitoring system for quality assurance of the policies.
To prepare a detailed Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) at the end of the academic year and submit the same to Governing Body/University.
Add on content-Theory & Lab
Make up tests
Collection of teaching outcome feedback (course assessment) from students at the end of the semester
Collection of exit feedback from final year students at the end of the academic year